Seal \"lost not lost\" has not been clear, cohesion culture into the director's rights were \"abducted \"\"Luo Shengmen. On the evening of January 2, Juli Culture replied to the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's inquiry and responded to the details of the runaway seal. However, in response, the two directors disagreed, including one who had just taken office in early december and resigned, claiming that his rights were \"kidnapped \".
Juli culture first replied to the specific situation of seal loss. The reply letter showed that Juli culture, including listed companies and subsidiaries, had a total of 30 operators'seals out of control, which could affect the preparation of the company's annual earnings report for 2019. In addition, for these seals out of control of the main business whether there is real control, Juli culture called \"from the ownership structure to enjoy control.\"
However, two directors of Juli culture objected to the claim that the seal was \"out of control \". According to the announcement, Juli Culture Director Zhang Chu, Lin Mingjun said the two received an email from legal person Yu Haifeng, stating that \"the official seal of the listed company is now in the custody of Yu Haifeng, has not been lost, Yu Haifeng has written to the current chairman of the listed company Chen Zhijian and director Jiang Feixiong, a new Dong Office, detailed reasons for the custody of the official seal at Yu Haifeng and the transfer procedures, the above personnel have not been handled in accordance with the normal handover procedures.\"
In addition, regarding the announcement of the runaway seal issued by Juli Culture on December 24 last year, both men said that they had violated the principle of authenticity of the letter by issuing it on the basis of \"the company and all the members of the board of directors guaranteeing the authenticity, accuracy and integrity of the information disclosure without false records, misleading complaints or material omissions\" without consulting them beforehand. They also solemnly declare that \"I cannot guarantee the authenticity of their information disclosure \".
At the same time, director Lin Mingjun also issued a statement to apply for separation. There are three reasons: first, the election of the current board of directors by the general meeting of shareholders on December 6,2019 is suspected of violating the rules; second, the procedure of electing the chairman of the new board of directors on December 9,2019 is illegal, the issue of electing the chairman of the board has not been notified five days in advance according to the company's articles of association, and it hastily sent him an email to collect candidates more than 10 minutes before the meeting, violating the rights and interests of the directors; in addition, the announcement of December 24,2019, on the company seal and other out of control, there is false promise, without consulting its opinion, its director's rights have been completely \"kidnapped \". Lin Mingjun also finally stressed that \"I have not resigned for personal reasons \".
On December 6 last year, Lin Mingjun was selected as a director at Juli Culture's second interim general meeting in 2019, less than a month so far, according to the announcement. Lin's career experience is very rich, has served as editor-in-chief of Hexin Securities Channel, senior manager of Tom online website, content director of QQ.com, CEO of Automotive Review Network; since 2015, as CEO of Amoy.
Chen Zhijian, the current chairman of Juli Culture, said Yu Haifeng no longer has the main qualifications to act and perform the duties of legal representative. According to the company's regulations, Yu Haifeng does not have the qualification to keep the company's seal, license materials, its refusal to hand over and other acts in violation of the company's \"seal management system\" related provisions. Director Zhang Chu and Lin Mingjun lack the factual basis for the reply to this letter of concern, and the relevant contents in the announcement disclosed by the company on October 24,2019 are true.
In response to Mr. Lin's challenge in his resignation statement, Mr. Chen said the second interim general meeting on December 6,2019 was legal and valid, and the results of the directors'election for this general meeting were valid. In addition, before the new board of directors elects the chairman on December 9,2019, the important positions of chairman, Dong Secretary, financial director and so on have been vacant, which is an emergency situation, it is necessary to convene the board of directors as soon as possible, the convening of the meeting is in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations, and the result of deliberation is also legal and effective.
As for the \"kidnapping\" of directors'rights and interests proposed by Mr. Lin, Mr. Chen said the company would retain the right to hold him liable for breach of the law by illegally disclosing the company's resignation through the statutory disclosure media through third-party media. (Reporter Han Yuanfei)